Friday, July 29, 2022

Turn the other cheeky hypocrisy: Will Smith should have challenged Chris Rock to a duel

 

I just saw a post from the Daily Mail where Will Smith was said to be "groveling," apologizing in an agonizing plea to be forgiven by the whole world and Chris Rock, who he had slapped for what appeared to be the dishonoring of his wife with a pathetic joke about her bad "lack of hair" day.

 

All I know, after having sat through the groveling video, is that watching a man having to apologize, and talking about his feelings and "hurting" all these other people he didn't actually slap, and being remorseful, because his slap-ee has apparently refused to turn the other cheek, is just stupid and dehumanizing.

 

In the not so distant past, if it was even "felt" or merely appeared to be the case that a respectable woman had been somehow dishonored by a man (perhaps by being a foreigner and offering her a flower as in Robert Hugh Benson's excellent book The Coward, or by accidentally breaking into a respectable adulteress's apartment and mistaking her for a dis-respectable madam in Luigi Pirandello's excellent play, The Rules of the Game, et cetera, see also: real history)  he would most likely be challenged to a duel. 

 

And then someone would most likely die. 


 
VIOLENCE! VIOLENCE! Who's Afraid of a Little Violence?

And if he refused to fight the duel once challenged? Well, he would be a coward (See Benson's flaying of this practice finally banned by the Catholic Church in the before mentioned book).                        

Men know that you cannot hit a woman, and most women abuse this knowledge by pushing them past the point to where the only reasonable thing left for the man to do is walk away through the heckling, or to throw an eye gouging worthy of Moe Howard.

 

Men, formed from the slime of the earth, subsist in the realm of the physical and when things get metaphysically out of control the only way to restore order and settle the flying disorder is to throw down.

 

This brings a sort of economy to male relationships that cannot truly exist between a man and a feminine woman.   


But this logical conclusion to male disputes and playground bullies is frowned upon by the effeminate establishment of the religion of niceness, which considers anything not nice as heretical.

 

And there are many not nice things.

 

Words are now considered to be as sharp as knives and snowflakes bleed real blood (from frosty eyes or ears, supposedly) when even overhearing a loose "faggot" or "him" when he is really an imaginary "her," and any kind of real violence is relegated to the impotent or fantastical fists of the military with "bombs by push button," or paid agitators, or patsy mass shooters, or really guilt-ridden and angry women at pro-life protests, et cetera.


Good comedy is always slightly offensive because good comedy must include the truth, and truth is always offensive to our pride, our dark desires, and the overall state of the fallen world. Exposing that seemingly absurd conflict with the truth and foibles and sinfulness of fallen man, is where the best humor (which is dark humor) resides.

 

It may be argued that Chris Rock's joke was not good comedy, but that is besides the point.

 

Will Smith, as well as many others, saw that making his wife the butt of a joke was dishonorable and so the only logical answer was: since dueling was outlawed long ago, Will Smith got up and slapped him before waiting for dawn.

 

Who's Dawn, you ask?

 

The point is that he didn't even kill Chris Rock.

 

He didn't kill comedy, and he didn't do anything horribly immoral. It wasn't a very classy thing to do, but we are talking about stars here. A bunch of degenerate stars giving each other awards for mostly degenerate, boring movies. It may be unfortunate that it happened on "formal" TV, but almost everything is recorded and put on a TV screen now, from a brawl on the lawn of a house with a Ring camera to the trashy Oscars. This isn't the age of Joseph  Breen after-all.

 

In an age where there is a majority of  those who abhor violence while calling for it, labeling even opening your mouth and arguing back as violence; they sure get uppity about a real slap.

 

Men either have to preach without using words as St. Francis of Assisi, um ...preached, or be prepared to put your face on the line with what you say. No, we can't just expect people to start slapping comedians when they dislike a joke, but it may happen if your joke is about someone's wife.

 

Remember, only the court jester could tell the truth to the King, as long as it was amusing. This is the test of a true comedian, the best jokes are dangled under the guillotine. Will it fall or no? There is risk involved. Silence. Boos. Tomatoes. Make the executioner laugh.

 

And true, also stop being a sensitive iguana who needs to bring hissy fit violence into everything simply because you are faced with something you cannot intellectually refute.  It is the people who refuse to debate or argue that resort to, or evoke, the most violence.

 

When your sword is your only point, you might not have one.

 

Will Smith only behaved like any other man in history might have before we started neutering them at birth. 

And it did not even include the addition of guns, which has made such normal male behavior a little more deadly, but not for Toshiro Mifune, because even a pipsqueak with a gun can't overpower Toshiro Mifune (see the excellent movie: Yojimbo).

 

Maybe if we let males throw some punches once in a while without pressuring them to talk about their feelings afterwards, boys would tell their mothers, when they are trying to dress them up as dainty princesses, to piss off. Or maybe they'd even slap them. Equality, you know...

 


One used to be at risk of being excommunicated or put in the tower and stabbed in his sleep, and it is still this way in many parts of the world (go to Germany and talk about WWII...). Nowadays, in the States, you may be cancelled, receive keyboard death threats, or loss of livelihood, for saying anything that used to be considered common sense.

 

Words may not be swords, but they do have consequences. In a more manly age one of these men's corpses would be carried out by his second in an honorable fashion. Now we treat belligerent men caught up in this feminized, sterilized, and cauterized time as if they were Don Quixote fighting for a code of honor long abandoned by the female mind.

 

 I'm sure that many of the women in that audience had their unborn children violently ripped to pieces so that they might obtain an Oscar. Why begrudge a man his turn?


We need a little more of that violence on screen.

 

Not that I am advocating violence, or comedy at knife point, but most of the Hollywood Oscar attending scum need to be (maybe metaphorically) slapped anyway. Let's not be hypocrites.

 



 

 

 

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

A CHIP OFF THE OLD PETRI DISH: Why Your Children Might Hate You For Planning Them

Sonnie has to be in there somewhere.

 Old, confused parents are trying to find out why their adult children hate them. Their children have cut off contact with them, and researchers are trying to find out why this is happening, something being termed as a "silent epidemic, " literally, evidently.

Why Some Grown Kids Cut Off Their Parents Could their estrangement be caused by how we raised them?

One suggestion was that these parents had spoiled their children. This is obviously true, especially of the parents in the 1950's who surfeited their children on the spoils of war and delusions of generational greatness with material goods, but didn't seem to be as generous with imparting that invaluable gift of discipline and self control.

Still, this doesn't seem to explain the seeming mass exodus of "estranged" adult children. A little guilt at one's undeserved riches at their parents seemingly generous hands might still bring them home for Christmas, if not the gifts...

 Another suggestion could be divorce. Many of these children witnessed their parent's superb ability at dropping their mothers or fathers like a hot potato when the going got rough. Must we wonder why when mother and father have seemed to lose that glamour as a gift horse and are exhibiting that selfish need of self-less loyalty (something they've shown they don't do) from those they gave so much to, that they in turn are dropped like hot potatoes? The shoe is on the other soon-to-be-geriatric foot now, mummsey.

Sure, you can tolerate your children "putting you on hold" for a while, after all, you put them on hold to pursue your career, right? Or maybe you did stay home with them, while poisoning the air, begrudging your lot, while perched over The Feminine Mystique. Working for your husband and children in your own little empire of the home, which probably had indoor plumbing, (as an old Lithuanian woman once said: "if you have indoor plumbing you have nothing to complain about,") instead of a crotchety and usurious, bald-headed boss at the Acme and Associates, was a real sacrifice; we have been told. Feel guilty, children.

But this still isn't it at all. The root problem for the adult children who rip out the family roots is rooted in birth control and the planning of children, even if they were "unplanned" (abortion, yo).


Life is what you make it.

The Norwegian writer Sigrid Undset, in visionary aptitude, described this phenomenon of the "ungrateful" and hateful children in her 1932 novel, The Faithful Wife:

In former days families were so constituted that children and grandchildren accepted the advice patiently--partly because they were often very fond of their old ones. Apart from that they had a certain feeling of piety--they believed that family life was in conformity with law. God, or Nature, or whatever they called it had ordained it thus and thus; their parents had been subject to the law, and they themselves were subject to the law. Can't you understand that it can no longer be so when all the children as they grow up know that they have been brought into existence in order to fit in with a plan which other people have devised for their lives? Why in the world should these children of calculation think they owe a scrap of duty to their parents? They may be as fond of what they had made up their minds to have. We didn't ask to be brought into the world--that's what children have always said when they were discontented with life. But in former days the parents could answer that it was God's will and all the rest of it. Nowadays children know whose will they have to thank for finding themselves in a world that doesn't suit them. They are here because their parents decreed it so and didn't changed their minds while they were on the way."

In taking control of nature by unnatural means, parents have divorced themselves from the natural checks and balances of nature and the law of God that it is based upon, and maybe unknowingly, took it all upon themselves and their will ...like someone who ventures to take a freight train their own way, just a little bit off track...

Going my own way? It seemed like a good idea at the time....

 We have almost all been told, in near bravado, that we, like all of our other siblings were planned children. Our parents tell us this as if they were being responsible, and yes, they are, for our happiness: That's great, mom and dad, or mom and mom, or mom and brother, but you know you didn't plan it out all that well, because I want that trip to Europe, and I want to wear that skimpy bikini, and I have fat genes, from somewhere, and you suck at planning because this world sucks and my planned trip in it is no fun.

Instead of angst that levels out at God and, with grace, the eventual realization of sin, and our own bloody part in it, as well as the reality of nasty human nature, and Original Sin, we instead, can rail for a lifetime against those whom we had no control over, our stupid parents, whose own selfishness has made them our easy scapegoats.

Of course, the demand for children has taken on a Dr. Frankenstein-like flair when carried out by modern technology and things like invitro-fertilization, and we know how happy Dr. Frankenstein's monster was... 


A chip off the old petri dish.

 Nothing could seem more detestable than to be stuck in this bitter life merely because some selfish people wanted you here ...to suffer for their own amusement; and look at them retiring to Florida after they effed up the world and our lives.

And since your parents spaced out any siblings around your age, as did all of your neighbours, you only had a scary Barbie doll as a playmate, or invisible friend, and now they want you to keep them company?

See also: In-Vitro Fallout: Donor IVF Teen Says “I Wish I Had Never Been Born”

No longer is parenting seen as the grave responsibility for the eternal soul given or imposed on one (almost against your own will) whose upbringing will help determine one's eternity. Would children so passively be abandoned to strangers for most of their lives if this were the case?

Parenthood is now viewed as something one deserves and has control over (only if one has the means to buy the obligate two-self-replacement children vacations to Disney World, cute clothes, and a college education, of course). Well, maybe many of these planned children have since decided that these planned-parenthood-parents just don't deserve them anymore. After all, what did they ever do for them but give them a world of pain?

Signora, sucka.

And we can feel sorry for these forlorn parents because we are these parents and any children that we choose to have will probably hate us too. Think of how they will cringe if they can look back at all of their parents #lookatmycutespawn hashtags.

 Birth control has been practiced long before the Pill and Basal cell thermometers came on the scene, but at no seeming time has technology and immoral "law" so easily made a commodity of l'enfant. And being raised in such sexual corruption can hardly render us fit to solve the problem, which is larger than anything that we can solve at this point. But still, knowing as well as giving that gift of discipline, can help.

And as for the parents, there is always:

mea culpa, mea culpa,
mea máxima culpa


After all, there is also much to regret, which serves as kind of sober reminder. Maybe that lump of money saved from your job that is being used to pay your nursing home fee, might not have been needed had you raised the one child who would have made sure you stayed out of the nursing home. One never knows, does one?

© 2015 GAK






Tuesday, February 3, 2015

The Lion Broken-Hearted: The Macabre Gaza Zoo

Zoos are a cruel hell to begin with, but especially in the open air prison of Gaza:

Dozens of animals starve at animal ‘attraction’ in Gaza Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2936551/Sentenced-death-world-s-worst-zoo-Dozens-animals-starve-animal-attraction-Gaza.html#ixzz3QhOfGxHm

One might logically think that the man who runs the zoo (watch the video) is slightly disturbed in his quest to keep bringing in beautiful creatures that will keep dying because of the attacks from his oppressors in Israel.

A cruel fate for the courageous.
It is easy to see that a Gazan would empathize with strong creatures that are trapped in cages. This, along with displaying the dead animals' bodies through internet-class-learned taxidermy and having to use a weak home made formaldehyde (the only kind he can get), is a macabre statement on the state of life in Gaza. 

Nothing looks more like defiant defeat than the "reanimated" corpse of a captive lion that was poisoned (through chemical warfare) and starved to death during brutal attacks on its land, which it is essentially a displaced foreigner in. Yes, zoos are rich with irony.

In the article we are told:

Hassan Azzam, director of the veterinary services department in Gaza's ministry of agriculture, said: 'We have humble capabilities,' but the ministry encourages zoos. 

One might be led to ponder the reason for this encouragement for zoos by or for a people who is essentially being forced to live in one; a people that is not much better off than the animals in this macabre Gaza zoo.

Sometimes cruelty begets cruelty. The problem is that we have almost all become complicit with the cruelty of zoos...and Zionism.

 © 2015 GAK

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Man Does Not Live By Crack Alone: Working Hard for Your Money Doesn't Mean Much

You know them; those who shamelessly showboat their new trucks, plastic houses, trips to Africa, or craft projects with all that Ikea can supply; shamelessly, they think, because, hey, they (or their husbands or wives, or parents, etc.) work hard for their money. They post memes about it; how people with money worked hard for it, so don't begrudge them their indulgences!

Because I know how to play the game, and I'm my own god.
 Many a man has worked harder than you and came up with nothing. Actually, some pretty big geniuses and hard workers, who have affected the way you live right now, never made a killing off of their hard work. Yes, we trample on the backs of countless dead hardworking men and women who may never be known to us in this life; even those who prayed for the conversion of souls or got themselves guillotined for the pleasure. Someone might be praying for your lost soul at this very moment, or forgoing that espresso just so that your little lazy spiritual life doesn't kill you, like for eternity.

Of course, this mistaken belief in oneself as the arbiter of one's success correlates that the self-sufficiency sorts place the blame on those without enough money, especially the homeless, because they believe that the bums do not work hard enough, or are drug addicts. These self-sufficiency sorts will think these things about the homeless man or "crack addict" on the sidewalk as they themselves wait in the line at Starbucks. The self sufficients only see the undeserved and not-worked-for indulgences and addictions of others, but man does not live by crack alone, just as he does not live by work alone; even drug addicts need a bagel or a croissant sometimes.

Because they believe that they are their own gods and owe it to no one else besides themselves that they have a job that they are able to perform, they begrudge those who do not have these personal "blessings," and they see them as wholly to blame for their situations of squalor, especially when it involves the begetting of children without a trust fund or a daycare with all the feigned parental love and attention money can buy. They become angry that their money should ever go to anyone who is not as responsible or as industrious as themselves.

Hence, the self-sufficients will argue that food stamp recipients receive drug testing as they down their government-approved prescription drugs like Xanax and Ambien and cheerfully piss in cups for their lucky employers. They can sleep well at night knowing that they have health insurance and can deserve to purchase a good night's sleep. These are, incidentally, the same people who believe that the militarized police force is wonderful because they never do anything wrong.

With drugs one can neglect the mind and its nightmares.
This belief in the man-centered gospel of self-sufficiency also applies to the self sufficients' socially acceptable formal religion as observed in "health and wealth Protestantism," where one's favoritism with God is viewed by how materially blessed one becomes, because after all, God never said, "blessed be the poor," or that "the poor will always be with you." Their swinging book study megachurches will help you only if you deny the teachings of Christ (the Catholic Church, which yes, has been hijacked) and become one of them. They will not donate to your cause unless you at least pretend that you might become one of them...someday, (you can keep them hopeful by saying derogatory things about the Mother of Christ, or randomly exclaiming, "Jesus, Jesus.")

And these people love usury, which was also banned by the Church, because heck, if you have money, you better make money just for having it, and you also better make sure that the others don't actually get their grubs on some just because of your generosity.

And it is true that many hard working people are bitter because of their plights as wage slaves and their rape by usury. Hard work does pay off this way as well (in bitterness), because working for money, even a little, often requires a desertion of the mind, and the mind is not so easily scorned. Only a part of you is working when you are a cog in wheel carrying out orders that might not be good if you stopped and thought about it. But if you stopped and thought about it, you might have to quit doing that well paying job, and you'd be replaced by another willing cog who would blame you for being a lazy ass.

If I don't spray these crops with glyphosate, I'll lose my job.
This is what happens when we deny Christ's Kingship in Heaven and on Earth and entrust ourselves to our own industriousness, which we then easily believe is the prime value of a man.

Thanks to the neglect of the mind and soul, these self-sufficiency sorts have even bought their own place in hell, so self-sufficient and well-prepared they are! Faith, be damned! I hate to see the interest.

Hell is filled with those who neglected the work of the soul.

"Money buys your fate in hell."  
        -The Lower Depths, Akira Kurosawa, 1957.



© 2015 GAK


Friday, November 21, 2014

The Pope and Svengodlic: Exposing God's Magic




God is Houdini and the world is a work of deception, or sorcery, for us to expose.


Many a religiously indifferent guy and gal is thinking fondly of even the child molester church because of Pope Francis' recent exposé of God:

"When we read about Creation in Genesis, we run the risk of imagining God was a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything. But that is not so," Francis said.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-declares-evolution-and-big-bang-theory-are-right-and-god-isnt-a-magician-with-a-magic-wand-9822514.html 
 
The less distinguishing amongst us are now exclaiming: I knew God didn't create the bloody world out of nothing! They expected us to believe anything in those medieval times fifty years ago...

When Francis is confronted with God he is supposedly tempted to think of Him as a deceiver, a sorcerer, or one who performs tricks of illusion and sleight of hand. In comparison to this, even the fickle gods and goddesses of Greek Mythology seem a little more reliable, just, and cuddly!

But it wasn't magic that God used, says Francis, it was Darwin's idea of evolution, or something that almighty man made up anyway.

The main problem with this is that without the incorporation of atheistic worldly theories (the Big Bang, Darwinian evolution, etc.), which still do not account for a first cause, Francis thinks of God as a magician. This means that Francis must think it is up to him, or mankind in general, to betray God's slight of hand. Then we may be able to believe...but in what?

A cruel God of trickery who really didn't do what He appears to have done in the way it was done and condescends to trick us stupid Catholics into believing silly little pre-school myths?

This does indeed seem to render truth and the faith into subjective fluff that only a believer in establishment theories could ever be happy deceiving herself with.

Why worship a cruel God like that?Because, we are so just to uncover His lies, we possibly couldn't be blamed for Original Sin or the fallen world.

If God is just trying to trick us, if faith comes by exposing scripture and tradition as a sensationalistic lie, and if this evil world is just a side show in a circus run by a mundane God with a wild imagination, we are really in trouble.

No, it's okay, man.
http://www.kolbecenter.org/

 © 2015 GAK

Sick: Children Become Robots at School with new Avatar

What a bloody nightmare. Home sick from school? You can now attend school as a robot avatar:

Children can become robots at school

(Is that the All Seeing Eye on the blackboard behind the robot boy? Ha.)

The poor kids nowadays. I think this is atrocious, invasive and enslaving sort of stuff. After all, we can't let them miss any of their miseducation and indoctrination.

That week my sister and I lounged at home acting and recording our original old time radio programs on my Christmas gift of 100 blank cassette tapes would be now be spoiled...

New student?

And I might add, the robot is definitely an appropriate symbol of what unfortunately becomes of most studious students. Modern education destroys the mind by wiping out common sense and the ability to reason and turns its partakers into "educated" morons...or soulless robots.


We do not teach students how to think, we teach them what to believe. And what better conditioning than placing a real robot student in class, the perfect model.
 
Robots are sexless and soulless. Robots don't sometimes throw up in the hall. Robots don't appreciate poetry. Robots are a dead end. Our dead end.

© 2015 GAK